home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.uni-c.dk!inet!perjac
- From: perjac@inet.uni-c.dk (Per Jacobsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Is SASG shareware really such a good idea?
- Date: 25 Feb 1996 23:05:32 GMT
- Organization: The Shadows' Parking lot
- Message-ID: <4gqpvs$45m@news.uni-c.dk>
- References: <paul.3rez@serena.iaehv.nl> <655.6615T1011T2519@shu-wood.demon.co.uk> <4frb1j$buf@snail.stack.urc.tue.nl> <4fud8s$m9k@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <4go352$5g9@news.uni-c.dk> <4go4ab$9nn@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: inet.uni-c.dk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Scott Konowal (sjkonowa@freenet.columbus.oh.us) wrote:
-
-
- > I hardly think that MUI 3.x can be compared as a new car engine to
- > replace MUI 2.x's "engine". I feel there is enough change to justify this
- > as almost a new program. Let's see, you have the right to NOT get it, same
- > as you have the right NOT to get AmigaOS 3.1.
-
- I wasn't saying that you should be able to go from 2.x to 3.x for free,
- but commenting the guy who said people shouldn't expect to get bugs fixed
- for free. If there are some glaring bugs in the program i think a free
- fix would be quite in order.
-
-
-
-
-